The court relied on the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Abdullah v. United States Security Associates, Inc., 731 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2013), and held that although it would present individual questions, Walmart had “not demonstrated that such individualized inquiries will predominate over the common legal question presented by Plaintiff’s meal period premium claim.”
© 2018 Sergenian Ashby LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcome.